Hi Folks.
I recently acquired a nice 48G, my first graphing model. While the power of this machine astounds me, the display seems a bit weak, no mater how I adjust the contrast. I find myself having to seek as much light as I can find to use it, and even then I have to hold it at a certain angle to see the display well.
For anybody who has seen all three displays (48G blue, 48GX black, 50G), is there a noticable difference in the viewability of the latter two machines over the first one?
Thanks, and best regards, Hal
48G vs 48GX Black LCD vs 50G display
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
▼
Post: #7
09-12-2006, 09:49 AM
▼
Post: #8
09-12-2006, 09:56 AM
Uh, yes. Significant improvement.
Hi contrast pixellated LCD was not available in 1990. Edited: 12 Sept 2006, 9:56 a.m. ▼
Post: #9
09-12-2006, 10:17 AM
Thanks Bill,
Post: #11
09-12-2006, 10:22 AM
You may have a faulty unit. I have a 1993 48G, and while its display (blue) is certainly not the greatest, I find it has a wide viewing angle, is crisp, and readable even in low light. I could try taking a picture and posting it if you wish to compare. - Thomas ▼
Post: #12
09-12-2006, 10:42 AM
Thanks Thomas... ▼
Post: #13
09-13-2006, 06:54 AM
Here's a picture of my HP-48G, 1993 vintage. I took it in a dimly lit room, under a 60 Watt reading lamp, without flash; the exposure was a bit long, hence the blurriness, but you still get a pretty good idea of the contrast. In reality, the contrast is actually better than in the photograph.
- Thomas
Edited: 14 Sept 2006, 3:56 a.m. after one or more responses were posted ▼
Post: #14
09-14-2006, 12:39 AM
Thanks for the pics of your 48G display. I have a pic I would like to post, but I guess I don't know how. Putting the HTML script in the thread is no problem, but how did you upload your picture to the museum website? |