mea culpa



#3

Back in March I posted the program "A Cadillac Quadratic Equation Solver for the hp 33s" as Article 593. Correspondent Marcus von Cube wrote to tell me that he thought that the command in line A0008 was wrong. He was right!

My submission shows line A0008 as STO (i) . It should be STO i .

Recognizing that I had made one error in the listing I checked the entire listing. I found that line E0009 near the end did not contain a command. The command should be a divide.

Again, mea culpa.


#4

You can correct the article, I guess.

Anyway, don't bother. You're not a machine, you're human.

-- Antonio


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Overpriced 11C--mea maxima culpa! Les Wright 6 1,899 12-06-2006, 03:24 PM
Last Post: jacksonconsult

Forum Jump: