Hi and happy new year to everybody!
As promised, I return with the results of trying to fix my digital cassetes.
I'll use the Diego's message to compare to my experiments:
" (...) Regarding the length of the tape, I used my audio tape recorder timer to count the 8min 44sec. needed for the task. This is the result of calculating how much time a standar tape recorder needs to run 24'384m (80feet) between the holes, plus 2 x 25cm extra tape to reach the leaders at both ends."
Well, I've tryed this and I believe my cassette recorder isn't so accurate. So, I wasted my time and precious tape, because the length wasn't enough to the task.
After many tryings, I decided to measure by hand the HP actual tapes length = 25.08m .
So, by hand, I measured the CrO2 tape and cut it. This time it worked well.
"I've also wound the old defective HP tape into a standard audio tape shell... and of course played it!! The saturation is farily high >+8dB!! (I'm sure that my neibourghs' son is still wondering where the hell have I got this amazing new beat!!!! ;-)"
I've done this with another tape I've already replaced with chrome new midia and hadn't worked. I took it from the HP case and filled into a standard cassette. Again, using my cassette recorder, the signal was not so strong. May be incorrect tape type?
"Then conected an oscilloscope to the phones output and took a look... It's a 1'85Khz. (approx.) carrier with phase/amplitude modulation, as stated in the 82161 manual, separated in brusts and silences of 1'16s/0'6s ratio (approx.). "
"Translating this into 82161's read/write speed of 9inches (22'86cm) it results in a 8'9KHz (approx.) carrier. Those are "approx." due to the 82161's constant ANGULAR speed while standard audio tapes runs at 4'75cm. constant LINEAR speed."
"I decided to made my first attempt with a CrO2 TDK tape as I assumed a standard FeOxide tape would have some difficulties in handling the required saturation level and Metal tapes trend to be highly abbrassive."
Using normal tape - FeO2 - the digital cassette even couldn't rewind it. Using 60min chrome tape demonstrated again it is thicker than the HP one. I could find a source for a 60min Metal Tape. It seens to be even thicker than normal tape. Resuming, only the 90min tape could be filled in the HP's case.
"Cutted the tape, made the holes in their corresponding places with a 0'8mm drill bit, taped the leaders, wound it back into the HP Mini Cassette shell and insert it into the drive."
"NEWM 256.... and... IT WORKS!!!!!!!!!! ;-) (...)"
I could restore 5 tapes up to now. One is intermittent. other didn't work any way ... my basis material it's all over and
90min Crhome tapes are becoming hard to find (at least in my city if someone in Brazil find one, send it to me!).
Also, if you don't pay atenction and let the end go into the case, it's very hard to open it without breaking, as the parts are glued togheter.
It is not an easy task and the results may not be the expected!
(Just forgive my English mistakes!)
Thanks Tony, Diego, Garth, David, Etienne and Dave for precious support!
01/01/2006 - Artur