HP 17B, 27S Precedence (order of operations) « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 ▼ mktoy Junior Member Posts: 11 Threads: 3 Joined: Jan 1970 11-27-2000, 11:54 AM (Note to Dave: I come to this website EVERYDAY because of it's highly-detailed content on my prized HP's. This post is not meant to be nitpicky or petty. It is mearly an observance I stumbled across during my own calculator comparison. Keep up the GOOD work; we appreciate it! Matt) There may be a discrepancy in the MoHPC descriptions of the 17B and 27S Precedence operations. The following two sentences can be found in both of the 17B and 27S calculator descriptions: "The calculator used a rather nice form of algebraic logic in which pending operations were left in the display. For example if the user pressed 1+2*3, the calculator would show that expression in display." Using my own calculators, I find the description only applies to the 27S. The 27S follows arithmetic precedence as described. Upon pressing the "*" (multiply) key on the 17B, "1+2" is evaluated to 3. In other words, the 17B doesn't recognize arithmetic precedence. In Alegbraic mode, my 17BII works just like the 17B. Just to make sure I wasn't me making a (another) mistake, like a some kind of flag setting (there are no "flags" on these calculators :-), I checked the owner's manuals of all three calculators, concerning Priority of Operators, Precedence, Arithmetic Priority, etc.. Only the 27S manual (page 44) specifically says "The 27S uses a system of operator priority to evaluate expressions", then goes on to list the highest to lowest priority (y^x, then X and /, then + and -). I cannot find a similar sentence in either of the 17B/17BII manuals. However, both the 17B and 17BII, do use precedence in their Solver applications. On page 142 (both manuals), the following footnote can be found "Because the Solver uses arithmetic priority (x, / before +, -), a second set of parentheses... is not necessary.". Is the 27S the only Pioneer that observes "order of operators" precedence? Am I doing something wrong? Inquiring minds want to know ;-) Thanks again for this website, Matt ▼ Ron Ross Senior Member Posts: 673 Threads: 20 Joined: Oct 2008 11-27-2000, 01:11 PM You are correct in your observation of the 17 vs. the 27. Precidence is also lacking on the 19(the closest thing on the market to a 27) also. However HP also produced the 20, 21, and 22s models that were algerbraic and had precidence. The 22 was also a dot matrix display but with one line only. It is my opinion that the 27s was Hp's 2nd best calc ever made. The first? An HP42 of course.

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post HP Prime Stack operations from within a program John Colvin 1 705 11-08-2013, 09:45 PM Last Post: Helge Gabert 3rd order ODE diff eq Richard Berler 0 499 10-23-2013, 09:53 PM Last Post: Richard Berler HP Prime: Operations with Large Numbers Eddie W. Shore 0 478 10-19-2013, 12:24 AM Last Post: Eddie W. Shore Rearanging the "Fixed" sort order of Prime's Apps icons Joe Horn 3 822 10-02-2013, 10:24 AM Last Post: Han [HP-Prime xcas] operations with complex numbers + BUGs + Request CompSystems 9 1,664 09-08-2013, 10:40 PM Last Post: CompSystems WP-34S Matrix operations with routine-local registers? Tom Grydeland 1 600 09-04-2013, 10:46 AM Last Post: Marcus von Cube, Germany HP-27S speed compared to HP-42S Tommi 3 873 06-05-2013, 05:55 PM Last Post: Christoph Giesselink HP 10S+ order on DeRekenwinkel.nl Mic 2 603 12-06-2012, 04:44 AM Last Post: Klaas Kuperus more question regarding complex operations using complex number on wp34s wildpig 22 2,189 09-02-2012, 12:54 PM Last Post: Walter B Ranking HP 17BII, HP 17B, HP 12C against one another? Peter Murphy (Livermore) 7 2,751 08-24-2012, 07:10 PM Last Post: Peter Murphy (Livermore)

Forum Jump: