Custom Programming vs. Pre-packaged programming



#5

I prefer custom programming since it forces me to learn some mathematical concepts. I also like having to work out the problems and then to acheive a desirable result. I also like doing the research.

If memory serves me correctly, I recall this is an idea of HP users since they can program calculators to any way they want.

I usually don't use pre-programmed stuff because (a) I tend not to use it all and (b) I feel I learn more by doing it myself. Any thoughts?


#6

It depends on your hp model. But on the 48-49, some of the functionality can only be accessed by using sysRPL or assembly. In this case if you don't have the knowledge, then you are better of using pre-packaged programs.
Some programs are also too complicated to write in a reasonable time.
For instance, even though I know sysRPL and assembly, I use a prepackaged compiler or compressor (what is more I can then exchange files) because it would be too much work for me to do.

Of course for simpler program I follow the same rule as you, I try to learn a bit more every day.

Arnaud

#7

Hi, Eddie;

I totaly agree with you.

About going further, Arnaud points out an important aspect: going DEEPLY further. Whenever you want, there's even more deeper 'space' to go ahead.

Cheers.

Luiz (Brazil)

#8

Eddie stated,

Quote:

I usually don't use pre-programmed stuff because (a) I tend not to use it all and (b) I feel I learn more by doing it myself. Any thoughts?

Yeah, I've got some thoughts on the matter...

Doesn't this defeat the purpose of the calculator, which is to provide consistently correct calculations over a wide range of inputs with minimal user effort -- in other words, to be a tool that works for you?

The pre-programmed functions in the legacy HP calculators incorporated algorithms developed by mathmeticians, microprocessor coding by skilled programmers, and validation by professional software testers. Can you match that expertise?

The pre-programmed functions will run faster and produce more accurate results than the typical user program.
Why would one program Taylor series (or other algorithm) for SIN and COS, when the complete set of trig functions and their inverses is readily available?

In the case of the 15C, for example, where the transcedental math functions are defined for both real- and complex-valued arguments, there's not enough storage for user programs that duplicate that functionality.

You can write your own algorithms and compare accuracy to the pre-programmed functions if you like, but the best use of programming is to develop custom applications for your own needs.

-- KS

Edited: 24 Jan 2005, 3:44 a.m.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DIY HP 30b WP 34s serial flash/programming cable Richard Wahl 2 260 12-04-2013, 11:14 AM
Last Post: Barry Mead
  Programming workaround for "prepend" HP PRIME Marek Russ 4 268 11-29-2013, 05:46 AM
Last Post: Marek Russ
  HP 41 Advanced Programming Tips Michael Fehlhammer 0 138 11-28-2013, 06:11 PM
Last Post: Michael Fehlhammer
  Custom Key Asignment CD Dodds 2 165 11-15-2013, 10:13 PM
Last Post: CD Dodds
  hp prime - programming with lists giancarlo 3 247 11-10-2013, 02:13 AM
Last Post: Giancarlo
  wp 34s overlay and programming. FORTIN Pascal 6 369 11-08-2013, 01:28 PM
Last Post: Nick_S
  HP Prime Programming Tutorial #3: WHILE, INPUT, KILL, REPEAT, GETKEY Eddie W. Shore 5 336 11-07-2013, 12:25 AM
Last Post: Han
  HP Prime - programming bluesun08 2 199 11-04-2013, 04:31 PM
Last Post: bluesun08
  More undocumented programming limitations in the HP Prime Michael de Estrada 3 256 11-03-2013, 08:22 PM
Last Post: Michael de Estrada
  HP 12C Platinum Programming v. Gold Face Dean Lewis 10 508 11-03-2013, 07:30 PM
Last Post: Kimberly Thompson

Forum Jump: