Posts: 68
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2007
Just a thought as I set here an look at the 15.11$ Walmart ti-36x I use at work since nobody would bother to steal it, the newer order you mention are the same as the order on this new series TI. Could it be another case of, ;+} naaaa...must be an ISO standard we have not seen!
Posts: 14
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2008
Even the earliest *desktop* calcuators used the "/x-+" pattern (HP9100), even when the corresponding handheld had "-+x/"; compare for example the HP45 vs HP46 or HP67 vs HP97. The reason for the "/x-+" order, presumably, is that the operations appear in "order of complexity" from bottom to top, with the precedent of adding-machine style keyboards with the big "+" at the bottom. I don't know the reason for the "-+x/" layout; my best guess is that it again lays out the operations in this "order of complexity", but this time from the inside out. That is, the "most important" operator, "+", is on the "home row" of the keyboard, that is, in line with the middle of the numbers, with "-" and "x" on the adjacent rows, and "/" left over at the bottom.
Posts: 47
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 1970
How 'bout the fact calculators have:
789 456 123
and telephones:
123 456 789
Bert
Posts: 451
Threads: 107
Joined: Nov 2005
How about the accountants that yelled because their pinky had to travel too far for the + key, thus putting it on the bottom.