12C and its financial algorithms « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 ▼ Eduardo Junior Member Posts: 35 Threads: 8 Joined: Jan 1970 06-18-2003, 02:49 PM I found a very interesting article by a UC Berkeley math & engineering professor (W. Kahan) about calculation roundoff errors and poor processor architectures. What's interesting is that he compares HP with TI financial calcs, and he was actually involved in the coding of the *original* 12C's algorithms. I'm posting this as a follow-up on the controversy about the 12C Platinum's "solving for i". Dr. Kahan's article (pp. 14-19) discusses this issue quite in depth (for the original 12C). You can be quite sure the 12C Platinum does not use his beautiful ideas or it would be *at least* as fast as the 12C. I wouldn't be surprised if HP simply "lost" the original coding ideas used for the 12C and tried to reinvent the wheel (and if you read the article, you'll see reinventing *this* wheel isn't quite as simple as it initially appears). The article, called "Mathematics Written in Sand", is linked to from Dr. Kahan's web page at: The direct URL is: Eduardo ▼ Luc Chanh Truong Junior Member Posts: 8 Threads: 4 Joined: Jan 1970 06-18-2003, 09:15 PM Thank you alot, Eduardo, for your information. It's very interesting. Tony Member Posts: 111 Threads: 19 Joined: Jan 1970 06-19-2003, 02:55 AM Yep, that's a great article. The 12CP is really a very interesting machine. Every day I see a new bug!. Today I tried n=1 i=-.001 PV=100 PMT=0 and solved for FV=-99.999 which is correct. But i=-.0009 gives FV=100.0009. Yes, plus 100.0009! The answer should be -99.9991. I cannot imagine the coding that would do this magic. The old 12C does this correctly, so it is not something copied over. yesterday I noticed the 12CP does try and cheat when solving for i - but it only goes ahead and does it if the solution is exact. Today's one only happens if i is between -.001 and 0. ▼ eel Junior Member Posts: 1 Threads: 0 Joined: Jan 1970 06-28-2003, 10:14 AM >FV=-99.999 which is correct. But i=-.0009 gives FV=100.0009 I tried this on my 17BII, and the answer I got is FV=100.009! ▼ Tony Member Posts: 111 Threads: 19 Joined: Jan 1970 06-29-2003, 02:47 PM here the 17bii is fine, n=1,i=-.0009,pv=100,pmt=0 gives fv=-99.9991. Tony Member Posts: 111 Threads: 19 Joined: Jan 1970 06-19-2003, 03:52 AM On page 15 of Prof kaplan's "Maths in the Sand" is a "Penny for your Thoughts" example with n=31,516,000 i=3.170979198 E-7 PV=0 PMT=-.01 END: solve for FV=331,667.0067. The 12CP resolves for i in 280 seconds giving i=3.107401823 E-7. That's within about E-4%. The 12C gives 3.197401823 -7 which is 1% out, but it only takes a few seconds. All is not lost on the 12CP though - i did a 250 (the limit, due to a bug) line i-solve program that never seems to take longer than 40 seconds - so the 12CP runs the prog well - and for the above case it resolves the i exactly!! Probably a fluke, but shows what the 12CP can do. ▼ Tony Member Posts: 111 Threads: 19 Joined: Jan 1970 06-19-2003, 03:57 AM whoops the 12CP gives 3.170982000 E-7 in 280 seconds - a pretty good answer in the end. Only 2.8E-13 too high or about E-4 % Edited: 19 June 2003, 4:00 a.m. hugh Member Posts: 189 Threads: 23 Joined: Jan 1970 06-19-2003, 04:48 PM 280 seconds! wait! whats's this. here comes the hp9g, cover flapping in the wind... "I'll save you rpn mortals from evil tvm errors..." "finding FV is easy with my 24 digit precision. don't panic kids, i'll just use the textbook formula fv=-amt*((1+i)^n-1)/i" 60*60*24*365->N .1/N->I .01*((1+I)^N-1)/I = 31,667.0067 "ah! that was easy, now to solve for I in only 5 seconds.. just whisk together a quick solver..." INPUT L,H,E; E=10^(-E) X=L GOSUB PROG 9; A=Y Lbl 1: IF (ABS(H-L) < E*ABS(H)) THEN { GOTO 2; } X=H GOSUB PROG 9; B=Y C=H-B*(H-L)/(B-A) L=H A=B H=C GOTO 1; Lbl 2: X=C END "and the solve-for subroutine..." Y=((1+X)^31536000-1)*.01/X Y=Y-331667.0067 END "put in L=1e-30, H=1e-7, E=8 and presto!" x=3.1709792e-9 which is correct. Gee, thanks 9g, i'll never doubt you again.

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post 10bii Financial Calculator is on launch sale - 0.99\$ only John 4 1,395 11-10-2013, 08:02 PM Last Post: BShoring OT--TI-36X Algorithms Matt Agajanian 48 7,750 09-01-2013, 08:13 PM Last Post: robert rozee HELP WANTED ON ALGORITHMS Joerg Woerner 19 3,381 04-27-2013, 12:56 PM Last Post: Eric Smith HP-80 Financial Calculator (1973) BShoring 3 1,177 03-25-2013, 11:39 PM Last Post: BShoring Simple financial problem with a HP-12c Platinum Lapin 3 1,134 11-11-2012, 09:33 AM Last Post: Lapin HP financial calculator prototypes Keith Midson 4 1,214 10-06-2012, 03:13 PM Last Post: Harald OT: primitive mult/div algorithms Egan Ford 9 1,872 05-27-2012, 09:27 PM Last Post: Egan Ford Financial Calculations for the HP41: another enhanced version Luiz C. Vieira (Brazil) 0 580 04-16-2012, 09:16 AM Last Post: Luiz C. Vieira (Brazil) HP-41CX and Financial Decisions Module Cheyenne Whitley 22 3,804 04-07-2012, 07:51 PM Last Post: Garth Wilson HP 34s: Three financial routines Miguel Toro 3 1,030 11-13-2011, 03:56 PM Last Post: Miguel Toro

Forum Jump: