HP Prime integration



#2

The Prime correctly integrates the general case for sin(ln(x)). When I integrate from 0 to pi, it comes up with 2 choices...a correct symbolic answer, and a numerical approximation accurate only through 2 decimal points .7860+ vs? correct .7811+

Why is that?

Graphing is fantastic! Touch screen use for analysis of interesting points on the graph is outstanding!

Thanks for your hard work, and obvious continued interesting this project!


#3

In CAS view, I get two numerical approximations:

[.7811.. .7860..]

In Home view, I get .7811..


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Integration question and "RPN" mode comment Craig Thomas 16 912 12-05-2013, 02:32 AM
Last Post: Nick_S
  WP34s integration trapped in infinite loop Bernd Grubert 25 993 10-17-2013, 08:50 AM
Last Post: Dieter
  integration on 39gII emulator Wes Loewer 29 1,172 06-07-2013, 05:58 PM
Last Post: Chris Smith
  WP-34S Integration Richard Berler 15 676 03-08-2013, 02:29 AM
Last Post: Walter B
  HP 34S integration Richard Berler 16 641 02-18-2013, 04:42 PM
Last Post: Marcus von Cube, Germany
  [WP34S] Speeding up the Romberg Integration Les Wright 14 568 05-31-2012, 03:39 PM
Last Post: Marcus von Cube, Germany
  New variant for the Romberg Integration Method Namir 8 387 04-18-2012, 07:47 AM
Last Post: Nick_S
  Romberg Integration for 33s, 35s Matt Agajanian 9 371 03-26-2012, 10:00 AM
Last Post: Nick_S
  HP 32sII Integration Error of Standard Normal Curve Anthony (USA) 4 251 03-14-2012, 03:18 AM
Last Post: Nick_S
  accuracy of integration and solve routines HP 15C LE Jan 3 200 02-02-2012, 01:03 PM
Last Post: Marcus von Cube, Germany

Forum Jump: