old hp 20s faster then the newer ones?


I have a older model hp 20s (the brown ones) Sn#id94500666 and a newer black model with the purple and green numbers Sn#id03102813. If I run a simple program
lbl a
gto A
the older model is a lot faster. doing about 2 more operations a second.


Perhaps you could post the results of your test.
With the same program you posted my 20S (3121S...)does 4176 in a minute. And a 21S (2936A...) does 4235.


The older model hp 20s (the brown one)Sn#id94500666 got4748
The newer black model Sn#id03102813 got 4670

and i got an even older brown one sn#3420s81550 it got 4796


ACO redesigned some of the calculators in the last few years. Maybe the 20S has undergone the same process?

On the other hand, someone should try another of the 'new' 20S units, to prove that yours isn't a 'monday' machine;-)



Your actual program as displayed on my machines:

01- 61 41 A
02- 75
03- 1
04- 51 41 A

My results by serial number for 1 minute:

20S 2931A USA 3690 counts
20S 3404S SING 4778
20S ID202 INDO 4574

All batteries where new, 4.66 to 4.70 volts per set. I tried the highest voltage pile in the old US unit - no change in speed.


I calculated the ratio of your three results to their average and got 84.9%, 109.9% and 105.2%. My 20S, Indonesia ID836 gave 4749, which is 109.2% of that average.

Here's a guess: I'll bet the frequency is set by an external capacitor and a resistor inside the IC, or possibly an external capacitor and inductor. A resistor inside an IC would probably have enough variation to account for the range of speeds; I think the Voyagers had an external capacitor and inductor, and I know the Classics and Woodstocks did. But however they did it, and assuming they had a design that gave a fairly consistant speed, the easiest way for a sizable reduction in speed to happen by accident would be for someone at the factory to substitute a lower quality capacitor for the one that sets the frequency. You can get capacitors in a tolerance called "Guaranteed Minimum Value", which is sometimes stated "+100 -0%". These are intended as bypass capacitors for low frequencies. Compliance engineers warn against using them in signal filtering applications because they can be self-resonant at the frequencies you are trying to suppress.


Hi Ellis!

The 20S is a one chip design, with one 10uf tantalum cap across the battery. No other external parts of any kind. Zero, notta, zip. Amazing. So the oscillator must be a RC type with everything on the silicon?

I thought perhaps battery voltage might affect the speed, but tests showed no change.

Just process variations in the chip?


Well, I've always heard that the resistors on chips can vary a lot, like 50%. I don't know about capacitors on chips in this regard, except that the the capacitance value has to be kept small to reduce real estate. Maybe there is a way to design them so the process variation affects R and C oppositely, so their variation cancels in applications like an oscillator.

Speaking of real estate, here's a possibility: maybe the chip went through a die shrink and the capacitor came out different.

Or maybe, even though there is an internal RC for the oscillator, there might be a pin or pins to add external components to change the frequency. Maybe a PCB change resulted in more capaitance on that pin, which might just be connected to a test pad.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How much faster is the HP Prime than the HP 50g ? Michael de Estrada 13 2,034 11-13-2013, 07:38 AM
Last Post: DeboT
  HP-97 Service Manual, newer model davorin 6 1,336 09-16-2013, 10:45 AM
Last Post: davorin
  HP 20S Kate Field (Corvallis) 1 582 07-03-2013, 07:41 PM
Last Post: Peter Murphy (Livermore)
  Why is the 19BII faster than the 17BII(+)? Timo Labrenz 8 1,514 05-03-2012, 08:00 AM
Last Post: Xerxes
  Newer shaped calculators disappear from the HP lineup DeboT 18 2,189 04-20-2012, 10:51 AM
Last Post: Jim Johnson
  HP 20S with very high "off" current Neil Hamilton (Ottawa) 2 635 04-01-2012, 11:49 AM
Last Post: Neil Hamilton (Ottawa)
  Some Vintage HP15Cs Faster than Others? Bruce Zastera 16 2,135 01-26-2012, 06:04 PM
Last Post: Bruce Zastera
  Amazing! An HP-32SII is faster than an HP-35s Michael de Estrada 24 3,160 08-04-2011, 01:08 PM
Last Post: Neil Hamilton (Ottawa)
  HP 20S recurring key identification Andrew 5 927 11-22-2010, 03:19 PM
Last Post: Walter B
  HP41 faster after crash and reset? Timo 2 732 03-15-2010, 01:40 PM
Last Post: Timo

Forum Jump: