[WP34s] Matrix M.xx vs. M-xx


The matrix functions have just been renamed again from M.xxx to M-xxx

In principle that's ok, but 2 functions look a bit ugly now: M-+ and M-+* ;-)


I did that because navigating in the catalog(ue)s is harder with a '.' in the name (I keep forgetting to press f before the dot and never get where I want to.) I agree that the two functions you mention don't look pretty. Maybe we change that back to '.' or even no delimiter at all. For me, M-DET or M.DET don't look any better then MDET.


Yes, M+ and M+* without delimiter would be better.

But for all other matrix functions I would keep the delimiter, otherwise some keywords would in fact be quite counterintuitive. And changing it only for some (e.g. MDET, MINV) won't be consistent.


It's Walter's and Pauli's decision.


It's Walter's and Pauli's decision.

I know - as usual ... ;-)

It's Walter's and Pauli's decision.

Thus Marcus changed it ;-)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  AFTER HP-Prime update, Shift+Matrix CRASHES Joseph Ec 3 1,050 12-06-2013, 11:06 AM
Last Post: Joseph Ec
  HP Prime Matrix TERRIBLE bug and question uklo 19 2,644 11-25-2013, 12:10 PM
Last Post: Mic
  HP Prime: editing a matrix Alberto Candel 6 1,191 11-20-2013, 06:26 PM
Last Post: Helge Gabert
  Absolute Value and Matrix BruceTTT 5 1,105 11-11-2013, 11:52 PM
Last Post: Walter B
  WP-34S Matrix operations with routine-local registers? Tom Grydeland 1 611 09-04-2013, 10:46 AM
Last Post: Marcus von Cube, Germany
  Matrix Characteristic Polynomial - Reloaded. Ángel Martin 12 1,696 08-22-2013, 05:33 PM
Last Post: Thomas Klemm
  Matrix Richard Berler 3 737 08-18-2013, 06:24 PM
Last Post: Paul Dale
  Advantage/CCD Matrix Challenge Ángel Martin 1 622 08-09-2013, 06:22 PM
Last Post: Thomas Klemm
  [HP -Prime CAS] List, Matrix, Vector as one Array? CompSystems 0 460 07-26-2013, 05:22 PM
Last Post: CompSystems
  ELO - Domination Matrix Kimberly Thompson 0 425 06-21-2013, 05:34 PM
Last Post: Kimberly Thompson

Forum Jump: