HP-12c, November 25, 4046, answer



#4

In this thread, I asked the question why does the 12c calendar function have an end date of November 25, 4046. I noted that the number of days between the beginning date of October 15, 1582 and the ending date is exactly 899,999, and I wondered why the specified ending date was chosen by the 12c designers. Thomas Klemm thought it might have something to do with the fact that there is uncertaintly whether the year 4000 will be considered a leap year, so perhaps the designers ended the date range at that point because of that. Gerson Barbosa found a 1977 Hewlett-Packard Journal article by Roy Martin, one of the designers of the HP-92 financial calculator, who stated that the ending date was determined by internal register limitations. Thomas Klemm did some analysis of the actual 12c code and did not see the need for this limitation.

Gerson Barbosa found the current address of Roy Martin and I wrote him a letter asking for clarification on this issue. I received his very nice reply today in the mail. It turns out that Thomas Klemm was correct. Mr. Martin stated that they realized that calendar adjustments needed but not yet decided could cause actual calendar dates to deviate from the calculated results in the year 4000 timeframe, hence the choice of the 900,000 limit on the calendar function on the HP-92 financial calculator (and subsequent HP-12c).

Per Mr. Martin: The claim (in the HP Journal article) that the date was determined by internal register limitations and not any special knowledge of the future was tongue in cheek.

To make a long story short, the designers of the HP-92 limited the calendar days function to around the year 4000 (as opposed to year 9999, for example) because they couldn't know if it would one day be considered a leap year, as Thomas Klemm had proposed.

It is great that at least one vintage HP calculator designer is still around to answer such questions.


#5

Hmm. This get me thinking. It's my understanding that the source code for some of the older models has been lost. I wonder if we could track down some of the old developers and see if they have copies of the source in their records.

Dave

#6

Hi Don

It is also great that you could find Mr. Martin and clarify the issue. Many thanks for letting us know.

Best regards

Thomas

PS: It shows we have to take care when reading HP Journal articles. It may well be they wanted to trick us.

Edited: 4 Dec 2010, 8:49 a.m.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Strange HP 25 Problem (Repair) Onur Ilkorur 5 309 12-06-2013, 05:13 PM
Last Post: Onur Ilkorur
  HP-25 Wayne Selway 1 161 11-22-2013, 12:58 PM
Last Post: Michael de Estrada
  Interesting Base Conversions - Porting a 1975 HP 25 Program to the HP 35S Eddie W. Shore 1 167 10-13-2013, 07:49 PM
Last Post: BruceH
  TI-36X Final Answer Matt Agajanian 0 97 08-31-2013, 08:40 PM
Last Post: Matt Agajanian
  [HP-Prime CAS] Automatic Simplification (Direct Answer) CompSystems 6 274 07-26-2013, 07:20 PM
Last Post: Gilles Carpentier
  HP-25/25C Potential Matt Agajanian 14 625 07-17-2013, 02:57 AM
Last Post: Matt Agajanian
  Recharging original batteries in HP 45, 65 and 25 Michae Altmann 1 151 03-05-2013, 12:21 AM
Last Post: DavidShenk
  The answer to the second semi-mathematical puzzle Mike Reed 3 176 02-18-2013, 02:40 AM
Last Post: Derek Walker (UK)
  HP-25 keyboard Brad Barton 5 246 02-16-2013, 09:59 PM
Last Post: Brad Barton
  Answer to Mathematical Puzzle Mike Reed 2 179 02-08-2013, 12:11 AM
Last Post: LHH

Forum Jump: