▼
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2007
In addition to the obvious need for TVM and date calculations, I find the % functions on scientific calculators to be woefully lacking for the kind of % calculations that I do on a regular basis. Even the 27s (my overall favorite), which has excellent TVM and date math, only has the typical scientific implementation of % math. Of course I could easily write a Solver routine, but that takes precious memory.
This is one reason why I always keep a 17b handy.
Following the recent thread on the 30b, I was gratified to see it also has the full implementation of % math, what the 17 series calls "Business" functions (%Change, %MU-cost, %MU-price, %Total). With the added bonus of the scientific functions, I can see why it has developed a big following.
▼
Posts: 1,253
Threads: 117
Joined: Nov 2005
I always suspected me as not a good engineer, I guess now I know why :)
Well, I did my part to redeem myself - the SandMath module includes a %Total function, but I confess not having any inkling about the "other" percentages you mention.
Many times I found the issue with financial terms was on their insisstence to name and label every possible ratio, inverse ratio, and combination of ratios. The real problem for me wasn't to calculate what you needed to find out, but to "map out" the available ratios names to the problem in question.
Just as I said, typical of a bad engineer no doubt :)
Cheers,
"AM
Posts: 3,229
Threads: 42
Joined: Jul 2006
%Change is on many scientific calculators already.
%MU-cost corresponds to "% +" which isn't onerous.
%Total is "SWAP / 100 *", again not too difficult.
I doubt that a decent engineer would have trouble with any of these :-) I'm not sure what %MU-price is.
- Pauli
▼
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2007
Quote:
I doubt that a decent engineer would have trouble with any of these :-)
Wow, and I always thought I was a decent engineer.
Quote:
Sheesh. I think I'd prefer to just do those operations myself, based on what I wanted to do at any given time. The minuscule amount of time I'd save by having them be built in functions would have to be more than offset by the difficulty of memorizing what percentage operation does what.
Seriously, though you could say the same about many built-in functions. But isn't that the value of having a calculator with many built-in functions, to save time? Why don't we all just go back to using the HP 35, and forget about all the added utility since.
Posts: 203
Threads: 29
Joined: Nov 2009
> I'm not sure what %MU-price is.
This is used when you want to make a specific margin on selling an item. For instance, if it costs you $20 for something and you want to make a 15% margin, you don't sell it for 20*1.15=$23.00. You have to sell it for 20/(1-.15)=$23.529.
The %MU-Price does this.
All our commissioned sales people use this type of calculation all the time. Many can do it in their heads but none of them use HP calculators :-(
▼
Posts: 3,229
Threads: 42
Joined: Jul 2006
Thanks for this. I know of this just not by the name given.
Something to add to the firmware when I eventually get back to it.
- Pauli
Posts: 4,587
Threads: 105
Joined: Jul 2005
Do you think of something like this?
▼
Posts: 3,229
Threads: 42
Joined: Jul 2006
I spy the percent functions from the stalled 20b/30b scientific firmware :-)
- Pauli
▼
Posts: 4,587
Threads: 105
Joined: Jul 2005
Pauli,
you hit the nail on the head. I didn't want to invent the wheel twice. BTW, there are some minor updates in the project docs ...
Posts: 306
Threads: 3
Joined: Sep 2009
Sheesh. I think I'd prefer to just do those operations myself, based on what I wanted to do at any given time. The minuscule amount of time I'd save by having them be built in functions would have to be more than offset by the difficulty of memorizing what percentage operation does what.
▼
Posts: 4,587
Threads: 105
Joined: Jul 2005
:) So do I. But typical users of business calculators are ... different ;)
Posts: 149
Threads: 7
Joined: Dec 2006
Absolutely.
The %-related keys are the biggest waste of real estate on all the keyboards. My main calculator is the 17BII and I have no use for the % key.
▼
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2007
Quote:
My main calculator is the 17BII and I have no use for the % key.
Just to be clear, I wasn't talking about the % key on the 17 series, but the % functions in the [BUS] softkey menu. I for one find them to be very useful. Am I the only engineer (or non-business type) on here that does?
▼
Posts: 553
Threads: 57
Joined: Sep 2006
You're not the only one -- I like 'em too. ;-)
Thanks,
Bruce
▼
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 901
Threads: 113
Joined: Jun 2007
If you need both a scientific and business calculator then why not get a 19BII?
▼
Posts: 222
Threads: 21
Joined: Oct 2006
Hear, hear! I bought one in mint condition a few months ago for $40CAD and enjoy using it. I have stored a number of useful equations in it, such as solving for Canadian mortgages and some machine design problems in pressure vessel design. BUT, for pocketability, I often bring the 12C to meetings.
Jeff
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2007
Clamshell design is why not. 27s comes closest, except maybe the new 30b might fill the bill. That was my original point.
Edited: 21 Aug 2010, 8:46 p.m.
|
