It's been a while for me. My son is now asking the question. Many thanks.
Edited: 7 Jan 2008, 2:00 p.m.
What's the best calculator for a college Physics course?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
▼
Post: #7
01-07-2008, 02:00 PM
It's been a while for me. My son is now asking the question. Many thanks. Edited: 7 Jan 2008, 2:00 p.m. ▼
Post: #8
01-07-2008, 03:31 PM
What physics course(s)? And, will he be taking higher math courses, too (like calculus)? For the first two or three semesters of intro physics courses (mechanics, E&M, modern physics), anything with scientific notation, trig, and exponential/log functions should be adequate. Square root and square are mighty convenient, too! I used to teach both algebra- and calculus-based intro courses and I never used, nor expected my students to have, anything more complicated. In the HP line, the new 35S should do nicely. I took calculus back in the days lo-o-o-o-ng before calculators and managed quite handily. The fancier HP and TIs are apparantly thought to be almost necessary for such classes now, though. Others here can comment on that.
Post: #9
01-07-2008, 04:06 PM
Unless the college/professor/syllabus state otherwise, I agree with Dave that a basic scientific calculator is sufficient, and that the 35s would be a good choice. Some math classes have a recommendation for a specific graphing calculator. Two years ago I took a Linear Algebra class for which the TI-85 or TI-86 were listed as a requirement. I used an HP 49g+ due to my preference for RPN, and it worked out fine. Because I wasn't using one of the recommended calculators, the professor was not able to help me with the calculator, but I didn't need any help. Actually the professor had a hard time helping students with the TI-86 due to his own unfamiliarity with that model.
Post: #10
01-07-2008, 05:12 PM
Quote:
That depends on the instructor. Some insist on graphing ▼
Post: #11
01-07-2008, 09:47 PM
I had a General Chemistry class in which graphing and programmable calculators were not allowed on tests. I used an HP-32E. I considered using a DIYRPN with all support for models other than the 32E removed, but I wasn't sure that I'd be able to convince the professor that it met her requirements.
Post: #12
01-08-2008, 03:10 AM
It has been 10 years for me now that I finished my degree in physics but at the time I found the units calculation ability of the 48 (now 50) series invaluable. Arnaud |