With CPU speeds generally so far beyond single application requirements, I wonder what would be the justification for a truly new CPU?
If HP has made a decision to switch to a new technology, it's already surrendered at least some of the value of its investment in the current code base. Why create new technology when there's so much already implemented, available and supported in the form of fast, low-power versions of the Pentium?
What's the justification? Is it because they're implementing single-chip solutions and (presumably) need their own design anyway? Are profit margins so slim that they justify implementation rather than licensing?
I'm not (strictly) in the business, so maybe I just don't get it. Anyone care to comment?