Quote:
In RPN mode however I have typed exactly 550 (right shift) (zero
key) KEYTIME ENTER and I have received a nasty beep following
"Invalid Syntax" error.
Note that \-> is itself a command, so, except when in ALPHA mode,
RightShift 0 adds a space character after the \-> character, which
would account for the "Invalid Syntax" error. To avoid having the
space added, first press the ALPHA key, then the RightShift 0, and
of course enter the command line by pressing ENTER.
To set the KEYTIME value to 550, try this sequence of keystrokes:
[5] [5] [0] [SPC] [ALPHA] [RightShift] [0] [K] [E] [Y] [T] [I] [M] [E] [ENTER]
To check the current KEYTIME value, try this sequence:
[ALPHA] [K] [E] [Y] [T] [I] [M] [E] [RightShift] [0] [ENTER]
Quote:
The good old 48G Users' Guide didn't help either. I have searched
the command in Appendix G "Operation Index" where it is claimed
all the operations are listed in 48 series and there is no sign of
KEYTIME.
Of course, because the \->KEYTIME and KEYTIME\-> commands weren't
added until the 49G.
Note that in early 49g+ ROM revisions, the KEYTIME value had no
effect (although the commands could still be used), but since
there seemed to be key-bounce problems, it was restored in later
ROM revisions. It works in the current revision, and in all
revisions released for the 50g.
Quote:
I have tried (in RPN mode)
-> KEYTIME(550)
(What it says in the Advanced User's Guide:ü"KEYTIME(real) (sets
keyboard debounce delay from 0 to 4096 ticks))
550 -> KEYTIME
KEYTIME->(550)
KEYTIME->500 (also doesn't cause an error but nothing changes)
-> KEYTIME '550' (also doesn't cause an error but nothing changes)
Well, these are commands, not functions, so algebraic syntax
(parenthesized arguments after the command name) won't work, at
least not in RPN mode.
Also, be sure to avoid the space between the right arrow and
KEYTIME.
Also note that the KEYTIME\-> doesn't take any argument; it simply
returns the current KEYTIME value.
Quote:
Is my calculator in a mode which doesn't allow this command to run
properly?
I don't believe that there's any mode that would cause that,
although ALG mode would require different syntax.
Quote:
And my last question, does this have to be so hard? I mean this
calculator isn't about just running one single command but people
are trying to help me on this very simple subject and yet we have
miss guidences, errors and still couldn't get on with it? Does it
have to be this hard? I feel so depressed with this user interface
allready.
No, it doesn't have to be hard at all; I've always found RPL to be
very easy and intuitive. That said, the poor documentation is a
problem.
Regards,
James