Hi folks.
I wonder if anyone can wax philisophically for a moment as to why the 50G maintains no (apparant) distinction between vectors and complex numbers (visually or functionally), whereas the 48gx treats the two like apples and oranges...(putting them in different type brackets, and bestowing limited functionality upon vectors, etc).
I really like being able to use the >V2 command in the vector menu (on either machine) to input the real numbers in the bottom two registers directly as polar arguments, but it seems I'm penalized when I do it on the 48GX.
I'd be very interested to hear any thoughts or theories on this.
Best regards, Hal
48GX VS 50g VECTOR TREATMENT
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|