Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2013
I played around with the HP Prime emulator today & also tried the Gamma function. For positive numbers everything seems to be OK, but for negative numbers the Prime emulation gives different results compared to my 15C, 15C LE, 34C, 35s & HP49g+ (which all give the same result, e.g. 5.5! => 0.0600; unfortunately I forgot the result of the Prime emulator & my virtual W7 machine is not up at the moment...)
Might there be a problem with the Gamma function of the HP Prime? Or is it only an emulator problem?
Posts: 1,278
Threads: 44
Joined: Jul 2007
Did you look at the help for the function? Graph both Gamma(X) and X! and I think you'll see what is happening. Also compare the graph at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function to what you see on the calc.
TW
Edited: 21 Aug 2013, 2:54 p.m.
Posts: 153
Threads: 7
Joined: Jun 2008
If it's a bug, it must involve a setting of some kind, because after Calculator Clear on the emulator, all four of the following return the same correct result (.0600196013005) both in Home and in CAS:
(5.5)! (using the [] key)
(5.5)! (using the [+/] key)
Gamma(4.5) (using the [] key)
Gamma(4.5) (using the [+/] key)
If you see the bug again, please let us know what your nondefault settings are. Thanks!
Joe
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks, Joe.
I'll have to check that tomorrow.
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
On the HP49G+ and on the Prime, Gamma and ! are two different functions. From the manual:

Factorial: Factorial of a positive integer. For nonintegers, ! = ^{} (x + 1).
This calculates the gamma function.
value!
.
.
.
Gamma: Returns the value of the gamma function ( ^{}) for a number a.
Gamma(a)

Thus Gamma(4.5) = (5.5)! = 0.0600196013005
Gerson.

This was meant to Stephan. Somehow it has ended up here.
Edited: 21 Aug 2013, 3:05 p.m.
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2013
Thanks, Gerson.
Actually I know the difference between ! & Gamma. I just was astonished that my Prime emulator gave me some unexpected result, but as Joe proposed I'll check my settings first.
Posts: 2,247
Threads: 200
Joined: Jun 2005
I compared a few negative values (5.5, 4.5, 3.5, 2.25, 2.45, and 22.45) for the Gamma function using the emulator AND using Wolfram Alpha. I did not see any difference in the results.
Namir
Edited: 21 Aug 2013, 4:53 p.m.
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
You might also want to check your emulator version:
Posts: 735
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2007
WolframAlpha disagrees with the precedence of  and !: 5.5! = 287.885....
Cheers
Thomas
Posts: 468
Threads: 17
Joined: May 2011
Gerson
are you sure about 5.5! ?
I get this for (5.5)! with my emulator 5.5! > 287.885...
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2013
I checked the thing again this morning & got the incorrect results again:
:o
Edit: It seems I have problems with the images (if it's not only our proxy server) ...
The values are:
Gamma(4.5) = .245736133286
(5.5)! = .245736133286
However, after resetting the calculator it shows the correct result:
Thus it might have been some weird settings preventing the calculator to return the correct results:
Gamma(4.5) = .0600196013005
(5.5)! = .0600196013005
The version of my emulator is:
Version 2013 8 5. Rev: 4980
The emulator tells me that there's no newer version available.
I apologise for all inconveniences...
Thanks for your support!
Edited: 22 Aug 2013, 2:16 a.m.
Posts: 735
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2007
[img:http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/1623/yaui.png]
[img:http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/8314/dkpr.png]
[img:http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/6941/nv0h.png]
Not a problem with a proxy but with markup. And I used the direct URL.
Cheers
Thomas
Posts: 468
Threads: 17
Joined: May 2011
I got it !
CAS mode
Set <\ in degree
(5.5)! = .245736133286
Rev 4980
Posts: 468
Threads: 17
Joined: May 2011
Hi Joe
The bug is in CAS mode and ° setting :
Set angle in Radian
CAS mode
(5.5)! > .6...
now set angle in ° (always CAS mode)
(5.5)! > .2457...
(Rev 4980)
Edited: 22 Aug 2013, 3:14 a.m.
Posts: 3,283
Threads: 104
Joined: Jul 2005
The setting (Degree or radian) affects both environments (goto settings in CAS or Home and see they are the same). The error only occurs from the CAS screen, not from the Home screen.
Posts: 97
Threads: 9
Joined: Nov 2011
Hello prime researchers,
the gamma function is normally defined for complex numbers except the negative integers. Maybe there is connection between the DEG and RAD mode and the inconsistent results in CAS mode?
Greeting
peacecalc
Posts: 735
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2007
Quote:
More important to get things right, with a smaller subset of functions that are fully tested and well documented, before starting the "lets lump in everyone's favorite function" game...
Couldn't agree more.
Cheers
Thomas
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
Gilles and Thomas,
I did enter (5.5)!, but the history showed 5.5! (I hadn't noticed that). Looks like we have another bug here:
Cheers,
Gerson.
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
Good find! This means the formula involving sine is being used for negative arguments. The bug persists on Rev. 5106.
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
Quote:
However, after resetting the calculator it shows the correct result:
Thus it might have been some weird settings preventing the calculator to return the correct results:
Gamma(4.5) = .0600196013005
(5.5)! = .0600196013005
Not your fault, but HP's. They've forgotten to check the user's angle mode setting when evaluating Gamma . See Gilles's post below. You've indeed found a new bug. Thanks for reporting!
Regards,
Gerson.
Posts: 735
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2007
Quote:
This means the formula involving sine is being used for negative arguments.
= 0.24573613328569488790394658885834332520579131620384...
Quote:
The values are:
Gamma(4.5) = .245736133286
Gerson, I think you're correct! But then why is 4.5 used instead of 5.5 in sin?
Cheers
Thomas
Edited: 22 Aug 2013, 10:23 a.m.
Posts: 468
Threads: 17
Joined: May 2011
I tested with XCAS and same problem...
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2013
You're welcome. Actually it was by mistake... ;)
Does anyone know if the bug also occurs on the real Prime or just in the emulator?
Edited: 22 Aug 2013, 11:24 a.m.
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
Perhaps they're doing
(z)!(z  1)! = pi/(sin(pi*z))
and letting
z = 4.5
Thus,
Gamma(4.5) = (5.5)! = pi/(sin(pi*4.5)*4.5!) = 0.0600196013005
Considering the argument has been unduly converted into degrees, we convert it back to radians, that is,
z = 4.5*pi/180
and we get the same result the Prime is giving, 0.245736133286, which of course is completely wrong, as you know.
Cheers,
Gerson.
_{Edited to fix a typo.}
Edited: 22 Aug 2013, 2:53 p.m.
Posts: 239
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2006
Hi,
So, CAS mode does not show the expression the way you entered (CAS mode, Radians):
What is the difference between these two ?
Well, I copy the first one :
Then press [Enter] key:
Then, I copy the second one :
And there you have it. Of course, pressing [Enter] key gives:
Posts: 735
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2007
Oh, now I see:
Thanks for pointing that out!
Best regards
Thomas
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
So they look alike, but are actually different :) Perhaps more difficult to fix than the other bug, but I think HP should address this one as well. Otherwise screen prints won't be a reliable information anymore.
Regards,
Gerson.
Posts: 2,761
Threads: 100
Joined: Jul 2005
Actually I only intended to write it in an easiertoremember and less prone to confusion form:
Best regards,
Gerson.
Posts: 735
Threads: 34
Joined: May 2007
This formula reminds me of Valentin's HP15C Minichallenge.
