Posts: 4,587
Threads: 105
Joined: Jul 2005
In other polls, once you've voted it's done - for better and for worse. Our polls differ: you may correct your vote e.g. if you made up your mind, learned something new, experienced enlightenment, etc. Yes, such events may happen even in our age.
If you want to correct, please delete your old vote and add your new one. This will help us in counting. Deadline for all corrections is the official termination date of the poll, of course.
d:-)
Posts: 1,841
Threads: 54
Joined: Jul 2005
Quote:
In other polls, once you've voted it's done - for better and for worse. Our polls differ: you may correct your vote e.g. if you made up your mind, learned something new, experienced enlightenment, etc. Yes, such events may happen even in our age.
If you want to correct, please delete your old vote and add your new one.
Obfuscating by polling...Actually, that would make things worse
Quote:
This will help us in counting. Deadline for all corrections is the official termination date of the poll, of course
Since the sudden end date of the first "poll" is in the past, how should that work?
I think there are very few people changing their mind about certain poll questions. Since the first thread, which later became known as the initially not clearly specified and suddenly abrupted so-called poll, has numerous replies to various subtopics, it would be _much_ easier and cleaner to simply start a new poll, this time well-defined, with a self-explaining title.
As an example: the title could be :
"43S poll (end date&time): Arithmetic keys left or right" and could even be combined with a choice of the operators' order, which leads to a title like "43S poll (end date&time): Arith. keys left or right AND order from top"
Posts: 4,587
Threads: 105
Joined: Jul 2005
Raimund, danke für deine Meinung (thanks for sharing your opinion).
d:-)