Calculator key mechanics - Which design is more durable?

Hi forum members,

only yesterday I took out two of my non HP-calculators, namely a Sharp EL-512 and an EL-512H. The first one was used by my father almost daily in office for as long as I can think, the latter was given to me by my father when I entered the Gymnasium (High School). Both saw really extensive use over many many years and still work like a charm especially the keyboards.

I never opened one of my Sharp calcs, but considering the almost total absence of tactile feel for their keys I'd presume, that there is almost no mechanics involved in the keyboard design. Does anyone know how the Sharp mechanics compares to that of the HP keyboard?

Furthermore, that made me wonder which key mechanics design philosophy is the more durable one? The Sharp design with almost now tactile feel but (presumably) very limited and simple key machanics, or the well known HP design?

All my HP calcs still feel pretty new, but I can recall a number of TAS auctions that stated sticky keys or keys that lost their typical "klick".

What is your experience/opinion about this?



Compared to which HP keyboard? HP has gone through many designs over the years.


Well, the keyboards I thought about are the ones I have experienced first hand, i.e. HP-41, HP-42S, HP-48GX, HP-15C.


As Eric mentioned, there were and are quite different keyboard technologies used in HP's calculators under the keyboard. Mechanics was very simple (and I guess it still is): the individual keys are held up by the force of a mechanical spring. This spring also produces the "snap" or tactile feedback. The very first in the Classics were gold-plated sheets of metal since apparently no domes were available ... I leave the details for others who have opened more calcs than me.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HP-80 History, Design and Interesting Facts BShoring 1 945 11-30-2013, 08:50 AM
Last Post: Xavier A. (Brazil)
  AME Design Port Extender for the HP41 Dane Spillers 2 1,010 03-14-2013, 07:58 PM
Last Post: dane spillers
  12C in 14 Masterpieces of Gadget Design Egan Ford 10 2,432 07-31-2012, 10:18 PM
Last Post: Palmer O. Hanson, Jr.
  HP-28--better design? Matt Agajanian 7 1,872 06-27-2012, 09:27 AM
Last Post: David Tellet
  hp design influence db (martinez, ca.) 5 1,399 03-01-2012, 03:23 PM
Last Post: Bunuel66
  HP30b design choices David Griffith 1 817 02-13-2012, 06:41 PM
Last Post: Tim Wessman
  Design for a simple, entry-level RPN calculator Eddie W. Shore 84 11,356 11-04-2011, 12:48 PM
Last Post: Bart (UK)
  A design rule for WP34s library software? Dieter 10 2,226 08-15-2011, 05:40 AM
Last Post: Paul Dale
  Difference in design for 25 and 25c exschr 2 922 07-04-2011, 04:36 PM
Last Post: exschr
  Suggestion for improved physical design David Hayden 14 2,440 11-06-2010, 02:18 PM
Last Post: Mark Harman

Forum Jump: