Hi folks
I have an isoceles (nonequilateral) triangle, with givens of the angles and the base. Is there any way to find the area without using a trig function. It's my contention that one cannot...but then what do I know.
Best regards, Hal
triangle area without trig.

01072008, 01:06 AM
01072008, 01:48 AM
For the area of an arbitrary triangle you need its base and height. On first glance, I do not see a simple way to get the height even of your isosceles triangle without trig.
01072008, 01:50 AM
Hi, Hal  I remember from Geometry 30 years ago that congruence of two triangles can be proved by equivalence of three sides, so I figured that it could be done  i.e., a triangle of three given side lengths is unique. However, the expression for area isn't quite as simple as I thought it might be: From Schaum's Mathematical Handbook, Equations 4.5 and 4.6:
Area = sqrt [s*(sa)*(sb)*(sc)] Both the HP41 Math Pac and the HP11C Owner's Handbook and Problem Solving Guide include trianglesolutions programs, but neither uses the formula provided above to calculate area.  KS
Edited: 7 Jan 2008, 2:13 a.m. after one or more responses were posted
01072008, 02:00 AM
Congratulations! At least you have the right books ;)
01072008, 02:31 AM
Quote: How to compute the side lenghts if base and angles are given  without trigonometry, as the OP needs to do?
01072008, 03:31 AM
Using equation list in a HP 33s or HP 35s
A=SQRT(((X+Y+Z)/2)×(((X+Y+Z)/2)X)×(((X+Y+Z)/2)Y)×
01072008, 04:41 AM
A very easy way to get the area of said triangle without trig functions would be to plot it and measure... You might also consider using a Taylor series for sin and cos, so you would technically use only powers and factorials ;)
01072008, 04:52 AM
"George" (most Americans will recognize that this is a pseudonym) posted:
Quote: Oh! I read what I expected to see, i.e., calculate the area of a triangle without trig functions, given only the sides. Why would anyone not want to use  or expect to avoid  trigonometry when one or more angles, but not all sides, are given? For an isosceles traingle, knowing one angle is enough to deduce the other two. Every calculation of area, height, or side length, will require a trig calculation, though.  KS
01072008, 08:21 AM
Quote: If only you were right...;) My parents lived near Bedford Falls, Madison, IN, by the time I was conceived. As my father's given name is George he wanted his first son to be named after him but being only 18 didn't like the idea of going by George senior ... they came up with the idea of this unique middle name ;)
01072008, 09:27 AM
If you can specify the X,Y coordinates of the verteces of the triangle, you can use the polygon area formula, which uses only addition, subtraction, and multiplication. Go to this site:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/graphics/algorithmsfaq/
and navigate to section 2.01 for an explanation. The link given in that section has further formulas which may be useful.
HTH,
01072008, 10:42 AM
Thank you everyone for your responses.
01072008, 12:06 PM
Hello, I remember a formula that involved a 3x3 determinant, given the coordinates of each point. If (x1, y1), (x2, y2) and (x3, y3) are the coordinates, then the area is given by
Hope this helps.
x1 y1 1 A = x2 y2 1 = x1*(y2y3)y1*(x2x3)+1*(x2*y3x3*y2) x3 y3 1
Edited: 7 Jan 2008, 12:11 p.m.
01072008, 01:12 PM
Except if all you know is one side (without loss of generality, one can assert that the ends of the side are at 0,0 and x,0) and two angles, you need trigonometry to determine the coordinates of the third vertex. Stefan
01072008, 05:08 PM
Quote:Except??
01072008, 05:51 PM
Quote:If a is the base the B and C are the two angles, then: Area = a*a*sin(B)*sin(C)/(2*sin(B+C)) You can replace sin() with:
sin x = (exp(i*z)  exp(i*z)) / (2*i) or
sin x = sum( (((1)^(n1)) / (2*n  1)!) * x^(2n1) ) Why would you want to do this?
01072008, 08:15 PM
"Except... " is short for: "This would work, except for the fact that ...". A casualEnglish abbreviation.
01072008, 10:30 PM
George  Ah! That's rather clever; my apologies. I should have at least included "probably" or "likely" in the 'pseudonym' statement. I suppose that, for example, a Jesus Cordero of Nazareth, Pennsylvania could use "Jesus of Nazareth" as a technicallycorrect moniker, but people would likely doubt its authenticity. ;) For those who are unfamiliar with the American cultural reference, here's an excerpt from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It's_a_Wonderful_Life "It's a Wonderful Life is a 1946 American film... (which) takes place in the fictional town of Bedford Falls shortly after World War II and stars James Stewart as George Bailey...
 KS
01072008, 11:16 PM
Karl, Great investigatative work! tm
01082008, 12:27 AM
Yes, Sir ;) Just IMHO your statement would have been unambiguous without this word.
01082008, 04:43 AM
Quote: Trent, haven't you watched the movie in the last couple of days???? ;)
01082008, 09:49 AM
We watch it every year!
01082008, 01:10 PM
I never understood that "Buffalo Gal" song, George. What is a buffalo gal, and is it supposed to be a compliment?
01082008, 01:32 PM
Quote: ...my guess has allways been that it refers to girls from Buffalo, NY
01082008, 09:18 PM
I apologize in advance if I'm missing something already discussed in the thread. If we have an isosceles triangle, and divide the uneven side at its half, we can plot the height as a segment from that midpoint to the opposite vertex. Then, taking the uneven side as the base, which we will call "b" and each of the other sides as "a", the height "h" is h = sqrt (a^2 (b/2)^2) , so the area is A = (b/2) * sqrt (a^2  (b/2)^2) ... which is obtained without trigs.
01082008, 10:03 PM
Hi, Andres  Indisputable mathematics, but not enough data: Only one side length (the original base) and the angles were given. If both unique side lengths had been given, then we wouldn't even need the angles  the general formula that I (and John Howard) provided, or the determinant formula provided by John Keith and "JuanJ", could also be utilized to calculate area. Yours is a bit simpler, though, for the special case of an isosceles traingle.
 KS
Edited: 9 Jan 2008, 1:45 a.m.
01092008, 12:43 AM
Well now I can die happy. %^)
01092008, 05:23 PM
Well, it doesn't say you have to calculate the area, only "find" it. So you could draw it on a large sheet of foil, cut it out and weigh it, and the divide the weight by the weight of a square of unit dimension... You could probably get three figures? Otherwise, I don't think so.
01092008, 06:43 PM
01092008, 08:32 PM
Karl: Thank you for the clarification. I was in a hurry and assumed that both lenghts ("a" and "b") were given.
01102008, 03:29 AM
To turn the problem on its head consider the base of the triangle, length b, to be a chord in a circle and the two equal sides of the triangle representing radii. The angle at the centre of the circle, theta (used in radians), is given as part of the problem. Then an approximation to the required area can be given by Area = b^2 / (4 * theta) * (sqrt(4 – theta^2) / 2 + 1). This actually represents the average between the triangular area with a base length of b (calculate the radius or side using s=r*theta) and the sector area of arc length b (Area= r^2 * theta / 2). This formula can be used for theta values up to approximately 114 degrees (< 2 radians) and gives a maximum error less than 5% to the true area value. The only point trig has been used is to determine the true value for analysis purposes only! Below is a listing for an HP17bII+
AREA=L(T:THETA X PI / 180) X 0 + L(B:BASE) X 0 + where / means divide and X multiply. Enter THETA in degrees and then BASE value. Click on AREA to Solve. Chris Dean
Edited: 10 Jan 2008, 11:03 a.m.
01122008, 05:37 AM
I think that is more clearly stated at http://www.clarku.edu/~djoyce/trig/area.html: "Another is Heron's formula which gives the area in terms of the three sides of the triangle, specifically, as the square root of the product s(s – a)(s – b)(s – c) where s is the semiperimeter of the triangle, that is, s = (a + b + c)/2" Same answer, but provides a little more insight :)

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

Possibly Related Threads...  
Thread  Author  Replies  Views  Last Post  
HP Prime Triangle solver  BruceH  29  3,789 
11282013, 12:03 AM Last Post: Dale Reed 

Trig vs hyperbolic handling differences in Prime CAS  Michael de Estrada  3  807 
11082013, 06:26 PM Last Post: Mark Hardman 

HP Prime triangle solver oddity  BruceH  0  487 
10132013, 09:08 PM Last Post: BruceH 

Trig Functions  Howard Owen  11  1,709 
09162013, 02:53 PM Last Post: Fred Lusk 

Sierpinksi triangle on HP Prime  Mic  1  541 
09152013, 09:08 AM Last Post: CompSystems 

trig scales on the Post Versalog slide rule  Al  12  1,855 
09152013, 06:01 AM Last Post: John I. 

Some trig help, please  Matt Agajanian  33  3,221 
04122013, 06:39 PM Last Post: Matt Agajanian 

Trig Identity question  Namir  13  1,617 
03042013, 07:45 PM Last Post: Eric Smith 

Question about trig functions approximation  Namir  8  1,139 
01102013, 06:49 AM Last Post: Valentin Albillo 

WP 34S Complex trig/hyperbolic bugs?  Eamonn  35  3,831 
04262012, 07:32 PM Last Post: Pete Wilson 