WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum) +-- Forum: HP Museum Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Old HP Forum Archives (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) (/thread-236551.html) WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Gerson W. Barbosa - 12-26-2012 Write a WP 34S program that displays (and keeps displaying) at least the first 10 correct digits of Brun's Constant, B = 1.902160583104 (the last two digits are uncertain). The maximum number of steps is 10, plus one for each additional digit, up to 12 steps (LBL and END included). Tip: the following approximation may be used: ```B ~ Sqrt(Phi*Sqrt(5.0005)) = 1.90216058363 ``` where ```Phi = (sqrt(5) + 1)/2 ``` I have only a 10-step solution: ```001 LBL B 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 END B --> 1.90216058363 ``` Gerson. Edited: 27 Dec 2012, 12:09 a.m. Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Paul Dale - 12-27-2012 Saved one step immediately: ```001: LBL B 002: 5 003: SDR 004 004: RCL+ L 005: [sqrt] 006: # [phi] 007: [times] 008: [sqrt] 009: RTN ``` Pauli Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Gerson W. Barbosa - 12-27-2012 Quote: 004: RCL+ L D'oh, missed this obvious one! Gerson. Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Paul Dale - 12-27-2012 And adding a correction term takes three more steps, giving 12 digits on the display although the last is off by a bit: ```001: LBL B 002: 5 003: SDR 004 004: RCL+ L 005: [sqrt] 006: # [phi] 007: [times] 008: [sqrt] 009: # 53 010: SDR 11 011: - 012: RTN ``` - Pauli Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Gerson W. Barbosa - 12-27-2012 10 actual steps for 11 correct digits... this is really compact. #52 instead of #53 might be better. Gerson. Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Paul Dale - 12-27-2012 I didn't fiddle with the correction factor, just interested in the displayed value. Pity the correction value is >255 or an extra digit would have been available for free. I wouldn't be surprised if a shorter sequence were still possible. - Pauli (deleted post) - deleted - 12-27-2012 This Message was deleted. This empty message preserves the threading when a post with followup(s) is deleted. If all followups have been removed, the original poster may delete this post again to make this placeholder disappear. Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Paul Dale - 12-27-2012 Another approach, it gets thirteen digits in 12 working steps. ```001: LBL B 002: # 216 003: SDR 005 004: #058 005: SDR 008 006: #031 007: SDR 10 008: 4 009: SDR 12 010: [cmplx]+ 011: + 012: # 019 013: SDR 001 014: + 015: RTN ``` - Pauli Edited: 27 Dec 2012, 1:02 a.m. Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Walter B - 12-27-2012 Quote: If only B had made into the WP 34S :-) Is there anything B is good for beyond pure math? d:-) Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Paul Dale - 12-27-2012 What does it matter? More is always better! - Pauli Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Walter B - 12-27-2012 Quote: What does it matter? Thanks, that suffices as response - now I know ;-) Quote: More is always better! So you prefer 8.5 over 5.8 on the Richter scale? ([:-) (deleted post) - deleted - 12-27-2012 This Message was deleted. This empty message preserves the threading when a post with followup(s) is deleted. If all followups have been removed, the original poster may delete this post again to make this placeholder disappear. Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - fhub - 12-27-2012 Quote: Well, in 1994 it played an important role in the discovery of the famous Pentium FDIV flaw: That's of course a serious reason to include it in the WP34s. ;-) Go on Pauli ... :-) Franz Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Walter B - 12-27-2012 Oh yes - we won't take any lower grade challenges, will we? ;-) Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Gerson W. Barbosa - 12-27-2012 Thank you very much for you interest, Paul. I am sorry if I may have offended someone else's intelligence by posing a "lower grade challenge". Anyway, this was meant to be a simple mini-challenge. Gerson Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Walter B - 12-27-2012 Oooh, Gerson, you may have got my message wrong :-? I was just referring to Franz' post and meant we won't introduce a mathematical constant for less reasons than unvealing Intel. d:-) Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Paul Dale - 12-27-2012 I thought the challenge was interesting and I'd still be surprised if a better/shorter solution didn't exist. At the very least it helped take my mind off of the pain of my recent tonsillectomy for a while which was a significant benefit personally. - Pauli Re: WP 34S mini-challenge (B) - Marcus von Cube, Germany - 12-27-2012 I hope you'll recover soon.