![]() |
WP34s: SLVQ implementation - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum) +-- Forum: HP Museum Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Old HP Forum Archives (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: WP34s: SLVQ implementation (/thread-200395.html) |
WP34s: SLVQ implementation - Dieter - 10-09-2011 I just noticed that SLVQ may return results with slight errors even in relatively simple cases: -1 ENTERWith 39 internal digits a correct 16-digit result should be no problem. So what's going on here?
Dieter
Re: WP34s: SLVQ implementation - Marcus von Cube, Germany - 10-09-2011 If I'm not mistaken, SLVQ is not implemented natively but in user code (XROM). So the normal round-off errors may occur.
Re: WP34s: SLVQ implementation - Paul Dale - 10-09-2011 Solve is a user code program so much work isn't carried out in high precision (some is still). It also searches at display accuracy (i.e. using the approximately equal test). Thus, some lower order digits errors are to be expected.
|