![]() |
WP34S bug - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum) +-- Forum: HP Museum Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Old HP Forum Archives (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: WP34S bug (/thread-188783.html) |
WP34S bug - fhub - 07-26-2011 Ooops, found one of this nasty animals again: FP? should give the opposite result compared with INT? but in fact returns the same value!
5 FP? gives true BTW, the new implemented NEXTP is indeed a good idea! :-)
Franz
Re: WP34S bug - Walter B - 07-26-2011 Hallo Franz, Thanks for reporting! This bug must have been introduced recently. It's buggy now but works as advertised in build 1108 on my 20b.
Walter
Re: WP34S bug - Marcus von Cube, Germany - 07-26-2011 It's working again in the latest build. :-)
Re: WP34S bug - fhub - 07-26-2011 Yes, FP? is back again, thanks Marcus! :-) Franz
Edited: 26 July 2011, 6:09 p.m. after one or more responses were posted
Re: WP34S bug - Neil Hamilton (Ottawa) - 07-26-2011 Franz, If you publish them, I will translate them to the assembler's syntax and put them in the "./library" directory. Can you make sure you write a little description of the I/O so I don't have to make a mistake reverse engineering anything.
Thanks...
Re: WP34S bug - Paul Dale - 07-26-2011 See also JMB's excellent site which has HP-41 programs for factorisation already. These programs port across unchanged usually. Even so, there are far better algorithms for finding factors that the trial division. The above link has some but there are plenty of others.
- Pauli
Re: WP34S bug - fhub - 07-26-2011 Quote:Ok, I've got it - program deleted ...
Edited: 26 July 2011, 5:55 p.m.
Re: WP34S bug - Paul Dale - 07-26-2011 Why delete your code? It was a good example of 34s programming.
|