48GX - Silly question? - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum) +-- Forum: HP Museum Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Old HP Forum Archives (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: 48GX - Silly question? (/thread-188101.html) |
48GX - Silly question? - mr-scorpio - 07-18-2011 Hi there,
Putting aside the reason for a 'need' for this...
48GX 100! = 9.33262154439E157 IF TI deemed this ability useful ... What is HP's response in like for like capability?
Many thanks
Re: 48GX - Silly question? - Vladan Dugaric - 07-18-2011 HP-50G gives all digits too. You just have to use Exact mode and type the number without a decimal point.
Re: 48GX - Silly question? - bill platt - 07-18-2011 You need ALG48 or Erable (I can't remember whether either will do it) or other software loaded onto the 48GX to do that. In the 49G and all later versions (49G+, 50G) HP incorporated that feature as "exact" mode.
Re: 48GX - Silly question? - Mike Morrow - 07-18-2011 Quote:
It's called the HP 49g+ and the HP 50g. (Integer calculations in EXACT vs. APPROXIMATE mode. The HP 48 series has no equivalent mode.)
Re: 48GX - Silly question? - mr-scorpio - 07-18-2011 Ah.. Re: 48GX - Silly question? - Alejandro Paz (Germany) - 07-18-2011 The 48GX is from 93 and the TI-92 (the first one with such a feature) is from 95 :). That may explain why they cannot be actually compared. (I like some features from the 92 but I hardly use it). Edited: 18 July 2011, 3:32 p.m.
Re: 48GX - Silly question? - C.Ret - 07-19-2011 Hi, This is not a silly question, but an interessant computing challenge on both HP28 and HP48 advanced calculators.
For easy reading and printing dFACT returns all digits of the n! factorial into the stack by ten-digit numbers.
« -> n @ input n from stack
Examples: 0 dFACT -->2: "0!=" Upto ther nothing special and results are equivalent to built-in FACT instruction.
23 dFACT -->4: "23!="
Re: 48GX - Silly question? - bill platt - 07-19-2011 Very Cool!
Re: 48GX - Silly question? - mr-scorpio - 07-20-2011 Excellent little program! Re: 48GX - Silly question? - Gerson W. Barbosa - 07-20-2011 Quote: Anyway, your algorithm appears to be about three times faster than the one in the last message of this old thread, for the HP-41/HP-42S: http://www.hpmuseum.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/hpmuseum/archv016.cgi?read=108035 The author has used a LOG instruction somewhere in his program, which may have slowed it down a bit. Thanks for sharing it.
Gerson.
|