Texas HP Module $$$$ - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum) +-- Forum: HP Museum Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Old HP Forum Archives (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Texas HP Module $$$$ (/thread-157078.html) |
Texas HP Module $$$$ - Saile (Brazil) - 09-29-2009
Who wrote that Texas is not valued in relationship HP's? Edited: 29 Sept 2009, 11:54 a.m.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Michael Meyer - 09-29-2009 Holy @#$% ! Years ago there was someone here that was sending out HP calculators with TI calculators used as "packing material"!
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Juergen Keller - 09-29-2009 I didn't know (and still wouldn't believe it if I didn't saw the pictures in Joerg's auction) that TI produced an RPN simulator module. Doing that, TI acknowledged that RPN is superior to AOS, otherwise there would not be any need of such a module. Really amazing!
- Juergen
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Palmer O. Hanson, Jr. - 09-29-2009 Quote:Not so! All that they really acknowledged was that there were some hardheads out there in HP land, and they might make some sales with an RPN option. That is similar to what HP did when they offered an algebraic option with the HP-33s and HP-35s.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Juergen Keller - 09-30-2009 You are probably right; I'm just too much a techie guy than a marketing guy. But from the winning bid on eBay I conclude that this module is rare, so TI didn't sell many of them. Perhaps they missed the point that an efficient method like RPN also needs a quality keyboard to really be useful.
- Juergen
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Mike Morrow - 09-30-2009 Quote: HP has done a much better job of producing algebraic logic calculators (including those that "swing both ways") than TI did for RPN with this module for the TI-59. AFAIK, it's TI's only attempt at any type of RPN capability. I remember when these modules were announced. IIRC, the MIT Coop carried them, as well as a few other places in the Boston area. I never knew anyone who bought one. I had a HP-67 in addition to a TI-59.
A computer geek friend and I were intrigued by the TI Algebraic Operating System, since it seemed to have some characteristics of a line-by-line interpreter/compiler. Each "statement" would need internally to be parsed and converted to stack or register operations like RPN. It seemed to be a technically sophisticated way (like RPL) to make simple things complex.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Martin Pinckney - 09-30-2009 There was a thread on this last week (started by Joerg). Accessible here.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ (and HP 9820) - Andrés C. Rodríguez (Argentina) - 09-30-2009 IIRC, the HP 9820 desktop calculator (there is information about it here at the MoHPC) accepts algebraic programs and formulas from the user. It even allows for implied multiplication, such as 2ab+3a. But, internally, it converts all to RPN, and stores the program in RPN syntax. When the user wants to read, edit or list a program, the RPN code is "decompiled" to show it in the algebraic way.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ (and HP 9820) - Mike Morrow - 09-30-2009 Yes, it's true that the HP 9820 is algebraic. The HP 9820 was the first HP calculator I ever used. It was employed as a logic board controller in an early digital systems class at Georgia Tech in the early 1970s. I have a complete but non-working HP 9820 that I bought for $10 a decade ago, just for nostalgia. It's impressively built.
Thus, HP has some long-time expertise with algebraic calculators. OTOH, TI has never made any RPN calculators (except this weak module).
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ (and HP 9820) - Don Shepherd - 09-30-2009 Quote:
Mike, I doubt TI has any regrets about not entering the RPN market. I suspect they make more money from the TI-83 alone than HP makes from all their calculators.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Palmer O. Hanson, Jr. - 10-01-2009 Quote:What RPN really needed in those days was a credible power supply design. Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Daniel Diggelmann - 10-02-2009 very true Jürgen and it seems that HP have long forgotten about this requirement.
Edited: 2 Oct 2009, 12:13 a.m.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Valentin Albillo - 10-02-2009
Juergen wrote:
Wrong in both counts. First, this wasn't an "RPN simulator" in the sense I think you're assuming it to be, i.e., a module which would allow you to perform RPN operations from the keyboard and such, as if you were using an HP-25 or HP-67, say, to perform some casual calculations. Nothing of the sort. What this TI module did was accept an RPN program written for the HP-67/97, which you would enter as the corresponding numeric keycodes (say 31 25 00 for "LABEL 0" or 35 64 for "ABS"), and it would then convert said RPN program to the equivalent TI-58/TI-59 program, which would then be output to the mandatory printer for you to key it in. Thus, it never simulated or made available RPN keyboard operations, it just accepted an RPN program for the HP-67/97 and converted it to the equivalent algebraic program for the TI-58/59, for you to enter it and then run it in the TI machine. The point was clear: using this module, a TI user would have access to the vast library of excellent RPN programs made available for the HP-67/97, thus greatly expanding the library software for their machines by also taking advantage of those quality programs written for the other side. I don't see this as proof that "TI acknowledged that RPN is superior to AOS", far from it. It actually was a very clever move by TI, even if the final results didn't meet the expectations. Regards from V.
Edited: 2 Oct 2009, 5:29 a.m.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Joerg Woerner - 10-02-2009 Valentin, Thanks for ghost-writing my comment ;-)) I just returned from a business trip and browsed the HP Forum. When I read this thread about my TI eBay auctions (BTW, a few months ago I sold a perfect, fully working but unboxed TI-59 for $315 to Asia), I thought about commenting the "Doing that, TI acknowledged that RPN is superior to AOS," statement. But you did already. Thanks!
Regards, Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Valentin Albillo - 10-02-2009
Hi, Joerg:
Quite on the contrary, after reading the fanboy-like comment by the other poster I assumed that he didn't know how it worked and what it did or didn't do, at all. Have a nice weekend and regards from V.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - tomdrewski - 10-02-2009 Guilty
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Michael Meyer - 10-04-2009 Thanks, Tom. I remember now. It's ok... most of those TI's can be bought for just a couple of bucks now. Still funny as hell.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - Juergen Keller - 10-04-2009 Thank you for clarification regarding the TI RPN module. I really thought it would simulate RPN input, because on the box it is advertised as 'RPN Simulator'. Making the huge HP program library available for TI-59 was really a good move and a comprehensible business decision. Anyway, one of my conclusions still hold: an efficient input method makes only sense together with a reliable keyboard. There are other RPN calculators (e.g., I have a Corvus 500), but I guess (I have no sales figures) they were not really successful because they lacked a quality keyboard.
Re: Texas HP Module $$$$ - db (martinez, ca.) - 10-05-2009 Jurgen; |