![]() |
hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Printable Version +- HP Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum) +-- Forum: HP Museum Forums (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Old HP Forum Archives (https://archived.hpcalc.org/museumforum/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming (/thread-103343.html) |
hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - oswaldo - 11-29-2006 Hi Could anyone advise me about a program/software that may allow me to transfer the basic programs that run on the HP86/87 in order that they may run on MSDOS GWBASIC? It would be sufficient to know how I could do it - perhaps through WORD or another program that runs in WINDOWS XP,which is the platform that I mostly use now. I know that those computers/calculators are very old, but it is for personal reasons that I want it. Please answer to my e-mail: oswech@cantv.net Thank you for your help.
Oswaldo (from Caracas, Venezuela)
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Namir - 11-29-2006 Hi Oswaldo, As someone who worked with both HP-85/87 BASIC and FW-BASIC, I have to say that there are significant differences in handling matrices and strings. HP-BASIC uses intrinsics (predefined-functions) and constructs for strings that are fairly different from the intrinsics of GW-BASIC. When it comes to matrices the gap is even wider. GW-BASIC does not support advanced matrix commands. There are many other differences between the two flavors of BASIC, such as the absence of SUB routines in GW-BASIC, and multiline functions in GW-BASIC. Translating from BASIC dialect to another is a project by itself.
Namir
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Patrice - 11-29-2006 And you don't even speak about graphic commands :-)
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Namir - 11-29-2006 Good point!!! I also did not mention file I/O operations. The HP-BASIC and GW-BASIC dialects are quite different!!
Namir Edited: 29 Nov 2006, 5:41 p.m.
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - oswaldo - 11-29-2006 Hi, I am deeply moved with the responses I have obtained. I am now more obliged to try to do a good project, which most probably shall be a totaly new one. Please rest assured that I will keep you informed of my progress (if any). My best to you all. Oswaldo
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Les Bell - 11-29-2006 Is gwbasic even available these days? There have got to be better languages, surely? Best,
--- Les Edited: 29 Nov 2006, 9:02 p.m.
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Namir - 11-29-2006 QBASIC is a worthy successor of GW-BASIC. I have QBASIC on my PCs and do use it for testing some algorithms. QBASIC is more structured than GW-BASIC. It has no mandatory line numbers, and can use Function and Sub routines. It also supports multi-line IF-THEN-ELSE and SELECT CASE decision-making statements, and Do-LOOP loops. In the early 90s I wrote a book about it, "Teach Yourself QBASIC in 21 Days", which was published by SAMS Publishing.
Namir
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Les Bell - 11-30-2006 Oh, that's right - I'd forgotten about QBASIC. Thanks, Namir. However, my question still stands, with slight amendment: I can't find QBASIC on my Win2K laptop, so is it still available? Or does one have to resort to a DOS 5 floppy to get it? Best,
--- Les Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Namir - 11-30-2006 Les, You can download an old DOS version (with QBASIC) at this link
Namir
Re: hp 86 and hp87 basic programming - Les Bell - 11-30-2006 Aha! Thanks, Namir. Memories. . . Best,
--- Les |