i'll post snapshots of all three on an actual calculator once i've laid them all out.
version 1:
version 2:
version 3:
Opinion: Version three is more pleasing.
Quote:
Opinion: Version three is more pleasing.
I agree, I prefer version 3 as well.
I also like version 3.
Things I like: the pi symbol, the sigma symbol, the separate Cy,x an Py,x labels.
Nit-picky things I would change: the slanted 1 with serif in both instances of 1/x, the x with a bar, the x in |x|, and the y with carat are not the same as the other lower case x's and y's, and I would raise the x in 2x and 10x.
...
Quote:
and I would raise the x in 2x and 10x
... and in e
x as well. And center lower case pi.
Edited: 9 Feb 2012, 1:33 a.m.
thanks!
those are excellent points! you look at the monitor too long, everything starts looking the same.
that's why a different set of eyes always help.
I like version 3 too, although I agree that this is nothing more than a personal aesthetic opinion.
But, and I know this looks too obvious to be a mistake, so there must be a reason I missed, why is there two entries for 1/x, Sigma+, Y^x, sqrt(x), a b/c ? E.g. 1/x is over the B key in white and above the / (divide) key accessible with "f".
Regards,
Philippe
As long as there is no LBL A to LBL D in programm memory the keys A to D will act as Sigma +, 1/x, y^x, SQRT(x).
As soon as there is one of LBL A to LBL D defined the corresponing key will A to D will call the programm and the "white fuction" has to be called the alternative, shifted way.
Regards
Dirk
One could have the g-functions on the buttom of the keys and leave their colour blue, the gold f-functions and the green h-functions above the keys.
...or rename h to something completely different, use a symbol.
Just for those who are familiar with the Voyager series. ;-)
But at the end, the WP 34s neither is a "genuine" Hewlett Packard calculator nor is it a Voyager series calculator. Why not try something different?
Is anyone interested in a transparent overlay for use on a repurposed HP 30b?
Edited: 9 Feb 2012, 5:50 a.m.
Exactly what I was thinking. I'm very interested!
Edited: 9 Feb 2012, 6:09 a.m.
Yes, I would like to see that.
Color choices may be challenging. The keys themselves can stay the same, white for primary function and blue for the h-shifted functions on the lower slanted portion. I think that black will just about have to be used for one of the keyboard-plane label colors. If the yellow-gold that has been used for the f-shifted functions on the black overlays shows up well on the silver background of the 30b, f-shift could stay that color and g-shift could be black. If yellow-gold does not show up well, I’d say use black for f-shift. That leaves the g-shifted and alpha labels. Not sure if green will show up very well on the silver background. For the default functions of the A, B, C and D keys, I might suggest something like below, i.e. white (edit - as Eric points out, this will not work on a clear overlay, so it will have to be siver) labels inside black boxes, to emphasize that these are primary key functions when active.
Edited: 9 Feb 2012, 10:19 a.m. after one or more responses were posted
White labels inside black boxes on a transparent overlay?
What kind of printer prints with white ink?
Eric
Oops. Guess that would be silver labels inside a black box.
Quote:
What kind of printer prints with white ink?
A very expensive one?
Come on HP ... make us a custom set of keys and faceplate. ;-)
Nice...now if only I could fit that in my apartment. :)
Eric
The consensus seems to be for #3, but as someone who is red-green colorblind, those two colors for f and g are difficult to distinguish.
LOL! at least you can purchase it. :) i have neither space nor moolah to even consider one.
Sorry, we know they won't do that - the bias to pay is too high.
I like #1. There is a certain retro appeal to it. It is also more readable in low light.